Thursday, October 27, 2016

Managing crises in the digital age

Social media platforms were a hive of activity on Tuesday, with Netizens posting photos and videos of the fire that ravaged the intensive care unit of Sultanah Aminah Hospital (HSA) in Johor Baru. Six ICU patients perished in the fire and one hospital employee was reported to be badly injured. 
Within minutes, the country got wind of the incident when the posts went viral on Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp. My friends were sharing the same photos on Facebook and WhatsApp. Some, in fact, did not click the share button for other people’s postings, but instead copy and pasted the photos on their own social media accounts as if the photos were theirs. 
When I was told “... you got no idea how the ground zero look alike (sic)” on WhatsApp by a local youth leader, I didn’t want to burst his bubble. He was excitedly sharing on WhatsApp the same photos that I saw on Facebook. 
I should have told him that I didn’t need to be there to know what was happening. I was following the various live feeds on my friends’ Facebook accounts. Through these feeds, I am most certain that these friends were indeed at the location. 
Also, I should have told him that ground zero is a misused term. For those who don’t already know, ground zero is a term reserved for the central point of the destruction caused by the detonation of a nuclear weapon. 
The fire at HSA, in my opinion, does not merit being called that. 
But, most importantly, how is such a crisis, if it can be called one, to be handled in this digital age? 
A crisis can occur as a result of an unpredictable event. The hospital fire is a good example. Crisis management is the application of strategies designed to help organisations deal with such a sudden and significant negative event. It requires the management to make quick decisions. 
One of the first actions in crisis management planning is to identify an individual as a crisis manager and appoint a spokesman, who is the point person, for information during the crisis. 
The field of crisis management is generally considered to have originated with Johnson & Johnson’s handling of a situation in 1982, when cyanide-laced Tylenol killed seven people in Chicago. The company immediately recalled all Tylenol capsules in the United States and offered free products in tamper-proof packaging. 
As a result of the swift and effective response, the impact on shareholders was minimised and the brand recovered and flourished. 
I know of some multinational companies which have instituted crisis management as part of their operations. 
Many years ago, I was invited by the management of a multinational company to train their spokesmen on how to answer media queries in times of crisis. My task was to ask them a barrage of questions and they were assessed on their ability to answer the questions in ways that were not detrimental to the company. 
They were also asked to plan responses to as many potential crises as possible. But, crisis management in the digital era requires much more. Correct information needs to be disseminated fast on all social media networks. It would be beneficial for all organisations to have a presence on all social media platforms. 
Oh yes, there are those who don’t think that it is important. Some would say that it is a waste of resources to assign someone to manage Facebook or Twitter for the company, if indeed it has these social media accounts. 
But, nowadays, when we hear of a tragedy befalling any organisation or anyone, the first thing most of us would do is check social media. The responsible ones will refer to the organisation’s or person’s official Facebook or Twitter page. Any statements, information, photos and videos posted on these accounts are considered official and can be referred to and shared by Netizens. 
The continuous flow of updates allows Netizens to post verified information instead of posting and sharing unconfirmed ones. In the hospital fire tragedy, for example, we read rumours that the fire started when a mobile phone which was being charged exploded near an oxygen tank. 
Another rumour also involved a mobile phone, which was said to have exploded on a patient’s bed, and caused the fire. Media reports the next day told us that the fire started in one of the treatment rooms of the ICU instead and could have been caused by faulty wiring. 
Crisis management should also designate “security” areas during a crisis, where in the event of deaths, bodies can be placed away from prying eyes and mobile phone cameras.
abhor the act of sharing these photos without a care in the world for the feelings of the family and friends of the deceased. 
Granted, it is not easy to manage a crisis, especially when emotions are running high. But a system needs to be put in place, something that will enable Netizens to be more discerning when sharing information.

Thursday, October 20, 2016

The Jungle Train

The train used to be my main transport home to Johor Baru. 
I would take the night train from Kuala Lumpur on a Friday, reach Johor Baru in the wee hours of Saturday morning and return to Kuala Lumpur on the night train on Sunday to reach the city at dawn and go to work directly from the station. 
My parents preferred me to travel home by train although it would take a longer time than going home by bus. They think train travel is much safer than the bus. And with the planned high-speed train to Johor Baru, it would take a far shorter time to get home. 
But, I can’t say the same for the train service to the East Coast. I would rather drive or fly to Pahang, Terengganu or Kelantan. I took the train once to Kuala Lipis on a tourism assignment. I had to board the train in Kuala Lumpur and go south to Gemas before taking the connecting train to the East Coast. 
I remember having to wait for a few hours in Gemas before the sleeper train to Tumpat arrived. It takes nine and a half hours to cover the 526km from Gemas to Tumpat, with stops at some of the bigger stations. In comparison, it takes about seven hours by road from Gemas to Tumpat. 
And, if you’re travelling from Kuala Lumpur, it takes you about seven hours to get to Tumpat via Gua Musang (without having to go south to Gemas first). But, some tourists enjoy the train travel to the East Coast. They call it the “Jungle Train” or “Jungle Railway”. 
They recommend that anyone taking the train to the East Coast should start their journey from Kuala Lipis in Pahang instead of Gemas. A Malaysia-traveller.com posting gave the scenic areas on the route. It describes the Gemas-Kuala Kerau sector as “miles after miles of oil palm and rubber estates, with the terrain being fairly flat”. From Kuala Kerau to Kuala Lipis, “the jungle closes in. 
We cross some large muddy brown rivers and it is more hilly”, the website said. It said the best scenery could be found on the Kuala Lipis-Kuala Krai sector and onwards to Wakaf Baru. 
“This is where the best scenery can be found. Huge rivers, the colour of strong English tea and spectacular limestone hills around the town of Gua Musang. Rice fields, scenic kampung and traditional rural life in Kelantan.” The writer of the website said the jungle itself was impressive, and when combined with the limestone hills of Gua Musang, river crossings and historic importance of the railway, “it is certainly a journey which should be on the list for all dedicated travellers to Malaysia”. 
It also suggested the train company consider a daytime service for the Kuala Lipis-Kuala Krai sector and “adding an observation carriage with panorama windows and an open air viewing deck for (mostly foreign) tourists, who I expect would be willing to pay more. 
With slick marketing from the Tourism and Culture Ministry, Malaysia could create another unique attraction to draw in visitors”, it read. 
I find the idea attractive. 
The Jungle Train, with an observation car, could be a poor man’s Eastern & Oriental Express, that five-star hotel on wheels, which takes travellers through Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. 
An observation car will allow passengers to better enjoy the scenic view. I am hopeful that authorities in charge of the rail services and those responsible for tourism promotion will incorporate the idea as the government proposes to develop the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) as announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak on Monday. 
The ECRL should not only be aimed at spurring a new wave of development to realise the social-economic potential for the East Coast, but also to boost rail tourism in the country. The 600km ECRL project is expected to connect Kuala Lumpur and the East Coast Economic Region and allow for faster connectivity to the east coast states. 
Tourism authorities and industry players should identify tourism potential to be further developed in Bentong, Mentakab, Kuantan, Kemaman, Kuala Terengganu, Kota Baru and Tumpat. I can already envision tour packages via rail for shopping trips to Pasar Payang in Kuala Terengganu and Pasar Siti Khadijah in Kota Baru or even across to Golok in Thailand. 
It was Thomas Cook, a cabinet maker, who started the first rail excursion back in 1841. Cook, the man who established the travel firm Thomas Cook, had arranged for a train to take 500 people at a shilling a head on a 20-km trip from Leicester to Loughborough. 
And history showed that the first railway track in Malaysia was built from Taiping to then Port Weld (now Kuala Sepetang) and the steam locomotive service was introduced in 1913. 
But, we have yet to fully realise its potential here. The Malaysia Rail Explorer website, said to be the Tourism and Culture Ministry’s programme to promote rural tourism experience by rail, does not offer much information besides listing affordable homestays, especially in Kelantan.